Skip to content
Moebiusol
DIGITAL SME Summit 2026Moebiusol presenting · Brussels · 16 November
ISO9001
ISO13485
ISO27001
IAS Accredited
Image

System views, interface contracts and decisions before implementation

MedTech & SaMD Architecture

Define how a medical-software product divides responsibility across its mobile app, professional interface, backend and infrastructure. We map users and system boundaries, compare design alternatives and specify interfaces, data ownership and failure behaviour. The handover is an architecture pack, decision rationale and a prioritised implementation and verification roadmap.

Architecture deliverables
  1. 01System & deployment views
  2. 02API & data contracts
  3. 03Decisions & verification
Define responsibilities, interfaces and design rationale.

Your starting point

Who this is for

  • Product leaders defining a new MedTech or software-as-a-medical-device capability
  • Teams modernising medical software with unclear boundaries or dependencies
  • Engineering teams needing a design and evidence plan before implementation

Customer value

What this helps you do

An implementation reference

Developers receive component responsibilities, interface definitions and the decisions needed to plan implementation.

A reviewable design record

Reviewers can follow significant choices back to their assumptions, alternatives and verification needs.

Where we can help

Service scope

Map the product boundary

Identify users, intended outcomes, external systems and the responsibilities owned by the product. Record the assumptions and unresolved product decisions that affect the design.

Define components and interfaces

Describe how mobile, web, backend and infrastructure components interact. Specify the exchanged information, access boundaries, ownership and failure behaviour that implementation teams need to agree.

Compare decisions and their implications

Review alternative boundaries and dependencies against risk, security and lifecycle needs. Record architecture decisions with their alternatives and rationale, and link significant choices to risk-control and verification questions so the design can be examined later.

Prepare the development sequence

For an existing system, identify coupling and gaps in design records. Prioritise changes and state which behaviour must be preserved and how the delivery team should verify it.

Tangible outcomes

What you receive

  • System context, component and deployment architecture views
  • Interface and data contracts with responsibility boundaries
  • Architecture decisions with alternatives, rationale and links to risk and verification needs
  • Prioritised implementation roadmap and verification outline

Working with your team

How we work together

  1. Gather the design inputs

    Review intended use, users, existing systems and constraints with the responsible product and engineering owners.

  2. Resolve the architecture questions

    Compare component boundaries and interfaces, document the proposed design and review risk, security and operational implications.

  3. Review the handover

    Walk through the architecture pack, open decisions and implementation sequence with the receiving team.

Illustrative engagement

Illustrative scenario: a team plans a patient application and professional portal around an existing clinical service. We map responsibilities across both experiences, define how observations reach the service, and document access and failure boundaries. The team receives architecture views, interface contracts and a prioritised development sequence, with unresolved product decisions recorded for its owners before implementation begins on the product.

Plan your next architecture decision

Tell us what your medical software should do, which systems it depends on and where the design is unclear. We can scope an architecture assessment or design engagement.

Start your architecture design